Elections Are Movement Killers
The electoral process itself is largely a distraction or worse from actual public participation in power.
One under-appreciated benefit of VotePact is that it fosters movements.
Elections now are movement killers.
They push millions into partisan boxes.
I’ve actually thought this for over a decade.
And for some time that it’s even worse — elections are thought killers.
VotePact changes that dynamic.
Freeing people to instead confront the establishment with more vigor.
Some people I know and respect pay no attention to electoral politics.
I’ve taken a different tact.
I use jujitsu.
The system wants everyone to obsess over the election such that the vast majority of people back the establishment parties. Not to do transformative activism.
Millions are enraptured by the latest soundbite, the electoral process itself is fetishized and becomes largely a distraction or worse from actual public participation in power.
Much of the public becomes pundified.
Breathlessly watching the establishment genocidal camps trade rhetorical barbs.
Making that the center of their emotional lives instead of the people next to them, or the people in greatest need in the world.
VotePact instead aims to have anti-establishment people break their chains and join together to take on the establishment.
The election becomes an organizing opportunity to build transpartisan relationships.
It’s about people finding a way to deal with their neighbors.
It’s about more and more people turning against genocidal logrolling camps of DNC/CNN/MSNBC/BigTech and RNC/Fox/Musk/Rogan to break their chains.
Let this be the last “election” of this despicable sort.
Today the Chairman of the Democratic Party in Philadelphia "consoled" Kamala Harris by saying "Maybe we should have nominated Biden." After I finished laughing and throwing up at the same time, I told my wife "If the Dems had nominated Joe instead of Kamala, the results would have been far worse for the Dems, and then they would be telling Joe maybe we should have nominated Kamala instead of Joe." Maybe we should not have any political parties at all. There were zero parties in 1789 when the first election took place. After Hamilton was appointed by President Washington as Secretary of Theft (sorry - I meant Secretary of the Treasury), he began to organize our new nation's first political party, which they called Federalists. Jefferson later organized the Democratic-Republican party to oppose Hamilton's party of close friends, political alliances, and corruption of power. I have no use for either party, or even for any party. I vote for individuals, not parties. I might have to stop voting altogether now that it is pretty apparent that no party in our party system CAN find anyone who is qualified. No one can even be nominated by either major party any more without being approved by the massively powerful but very few men who tell the wealthiest billionaires what they can and cannot do when they all arrive for their annual parties in Davos, Bohemian Grove, etc. After Generalissimo Franco died in 1975, Spain resumed their former practice of having a king. The new king of Spain's first official visitor was Henry Kissinger, who told the king who was really in charge of Spain (and it wasn't the king).
Watch this video to see what is here already. Reading The Message by Choates is akin to the sword of Damocles unleashed and Sinwar's Stick. Lets's go Americans.
This is a interview with Jacob Cohen whose book, The Spring of Sayanim, is being prevented from translation into English https://archive.org/details/JacobCohenDocumenterview480p
Here, however is Paul Cudnec's review of his book. https://paulcudenec.substack.com/p/the-stench-of-the-system-sayanim