Some of the Layers of Lies of Trump and Covid
Given my current health and other limitations, I can't give as robust of a breakdown of the latest regarding Covid origins as I've done in the past, see below.
But I hope these notes on the Trump administration's executive order on "Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research" and their "fact sheet" can be helpful:
* If this is a temporary pause on federal funding which will be followed by minimal reforms, then it will be more than anything an exercise in the management of the public mind. This would be similar to the temporary ceasefire in Gaza put in place just as Trump was inaugurated to get the public to put Gaza out of their minds. Of course, Israel then quietly resumed its slaughter-and-starve politics with minimal media attention.
* Pausing federal funding of so-called "gain of function" lab work is not the same as stopping it. It could still be funded by private or other entities, potentially at the US government's direction, just as official censorship has been effectively subcontracted to big tech firms. Meryl Nass gives a more generous interpretation of this question and all of Trump’s moves in her write-up.
* The framing by the administration and others of the issue as "lab leak" seems designed to preclude the notion that the Covid outbreak could have been intentional despite some meaningful evidence to the contrary.
* It is worth noting that the dangerous lab work was initiated following the false flag anthrax attacks, which were blamed on evil Arabs/Muslims but actually came from a US or US government allied lab. Congress never investigated this false flag bioweapons attack on it. See “Anthrax War” documentary, broadcast on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
* The order makes no mention of international or US law, specifically, the Biological Weapons Convention or its US implementing legislation, the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, drafted by the late Francis Boyle. Thus, it is about pausing federal funding, not stopping such research, much less prosecuting individuals responsible, for example Kennedy said he'd prosecute Fauci (who accepted a pardon from Biden.)
* While the US government has hollowed out the Biological Weapons Convention, Israel has refused to sign it altogether.
* The order frames this as a partisan issue, arguing that Biden is responsible. He certainly is to an extent, but it was during the first Trump administration which lifted the last pause on government funding in 2017.
* That pause was implemented on October 17, 2014, the day Ron Klain (who would later become President Biden’s chief of staff) was appointed “Ebola czar” during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Like Covid, this also likely had lab origins.
* US government funding of EcoHealth Alliance and its funding of dangerous coronavirus work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Ralph Baric's lab at the University of North Carolina goes back at least to 2015 and continued through the first Trump administration until after the Covid outbreak, when Trump finally cut it off.
* The stated goal is: "SAFEGUARDING THE FUTURE AND PROMOTING AMERICAN BIOTECHNOLOGY DOMINANCE." It reads more like "Securing the Realm" than a blueprint for ending illegal and extremely dangerous lab work. This would seem to confirm rather than detract from the notion, as I and others have argued for years, that this is basically biowarfare.
* The Trump statements do more to "other" various countries than to stigmatize the horrific lab work, banning US government funding for so-called “gain of function” research "in countries of concern like China and Iran and in foreign nations deemed to have insufficient research oversight." The Trump administration is far fonder of talking about "countries of concern" than "Dual Use Research of Concern."
* The administration talks about "transparency" but still has not responded to US Right to Know FOIA requests to USAID et al. I honestly do not know how to assess reports of mass destruction of documents at USAID at the beginning of the Trump administration. Is the ending of USAID partly aimed at preventing meaningful scrutiny of its role in causing pandemics through its PREDICT and followup programs? What is the status of such programs?
* Military contractor and all round billionaire apparatchik Elon Musk said in February of his DOGE project: "We will make mistakes. We won't be perfect ... so for example, with USAID, one of the things we accidentally canceled very briefly was ebola prevention." This seared in the public mind -- and especially Musk's rightwing fan boys -- that somehow USAID was actually in the business of preventing, rather than causing, horrific pandemics, see my repeated questioning at State Department. And it triggered liberals to triple down on USAID’s nefarious efforts.
* Meaningful progress is unlikely to come given the current political and media sectarianism. Antiestablishment forces regarding Gaza and Covid need to see they have far more in common than they do with the sectors of the establishment that pretend to care about these issues. A major aspect of this solution is my VotePact.org voting strategy, to realize an actual realignment. So long as the political system is so corrupt, technology will be used for nefarious purposes.
* It seems highly likely to me that mass biowarfare will ultimately — I don’t know when — be used as a manifestation of a resurgent outright imperialism, or at least the threat of that being used as mass leverage. It is quite likely that it already has been used to some extent in the post-World War II era.
See my original writings, from 2020 and some past breakdowns since:
The big lie is in the biology that ALL virology is built on models of synthetic clones made by CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys from PCR consensus sequences and grown in E.coli because RNA cannot replicate in the wild and petrie dish models used to create vaccines are ALL the same Gain of Function ie clones grown in bacteria. https://web.archive.org/web/20200803152807/https://www.promega.com/resources/guides/cell-biology/transfection/
The high purity clones stuffed into rodents are the models for viral infection but Mother Nature will NEVER change to adopted some petrie dish model. GoF is a lab tool used for decades and how EVERY mRNA TRANSFECTION was made. No GoF is no virology or vaccines.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
The "novel virus" was the excuse to roll out TRANSFECTION as an "investigational vaccine" and turn mop & bucket level lab tool into cash cow with IP reset. It was deadly by design because human bodies NEVER tolerate foreign proteins & it was known since 1999 Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger even if the protein was selected to repair a genetic flaw. https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
The only danger is delive3red by syringe.. don't accept the mythology of pandemic RNA molecules that's as real as Cat in the Hat pink snow sold with PCR fraud. Learn the bio0logy do not adopt the lies of an invisible enemy their swabs can find like shooting stars.
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N
If they might add to the picture, two more sites - what can anyone say about the GCBR Index? There's nothing but the map and I'm not a metadata reader. But the submenu 'Lab leak risk burden' has the USA tagged as '100' for risk, head and shoulders above the rest of the world.
https://gcbrindex.org/
And this,
https://www.globalbiolabs.org/map
And very active Johns Hopkins, WEF, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
"Our Mission: To protect people’s health from epidemics and disasters and ensure that communities are resilient to major challenges."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/
Where's a tangible benefit? And action items: conduct, engage, convene, educate. ?
"Together, we:
Conduct research and analysis on major domestic and international health security issues.
Engage with researchers, the policymaking community, and the private sector to make progress in the field.
Convene expert working groups, congressional seminars, scientific meetings, conferences, and tabletop exercises to stimulate new thinking and provoke action.
Educate a rising generation of scholars, practitioners, and policymakers."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/our-work-at-the-center-for-health-security
Regarding tabletop exercises,
15 May 2018
"Tabletop Exercise. Clade X
This training tabletop exercise is based on a fictional scenario. The inputs experts used for modeling the potential impact were fictional. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials.
Clade X illustrated high-level strategic decisions and policies needed to prevent a severe pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/clade-x-tabletop-exercise
18 October 2019
"Tabletop Exercise. Event 201
This training tabletop exercise is based on a fictional scenario. The inputs experts used for modeling the potential impact were fictional. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials.
Recent economic studies show that pandemics will be the cause of an average annual economic loss of 0.7% of global GDP—or $570 billion. The players’ responses to the scenario illuminated the need for cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society, to avoid the catastrophic consequences that could arise from a large-scale pandemic.
Similar to the Center’s 3 previous exercises—Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm—Event 201 aimed to educate senior leaders at the highest level of US and international governments and leaders in global industries.
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise
24 January 2020
"Statement about nCoV and our pandemic exercise
Center News
January 24, 2020 – In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/2020/statement-about-ncov-and-our-pandemic-exercise
"Our Work
The Capitol Hill Steering Committee on Health Security is an informal forum to explore new policies, programs, and technologies that can improve national health security now and in the future. It convenes staff from congressional offices, federal agencies, and the invited media and public to find ways to collaborate and strengthen our health security.
The Steering Committee is sponsored and managed by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. Currently, four bipartisan United States Senators serve as Honorary Senate Co-Chairs, five bipartisan United States House of Representatives serve as Honorary House Co-Chairs, and four former federal government public health leaders serve as Honorary Founding Members."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/the-capitol-hill-steering-committee.
As stated above the forum is informal, participants are invited, the concern is economic, and requiring , "cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society" - is this what public hearings have devolved to? For all intents and purposes out of the public eye?
Much more at the website,
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/