Given my current health and other limitations, I can't give as robust of a breakdown of the latest regarding Covid origins as I've done in the past, see below.
The high purity clones stuffed into rodents are the models for viral infection but Mother Nature will NEVER change to adopted some petrie dish model. GoF is a lab tool used for decades and how EVERY mRNA TRANSFECTION was made. No GoF is no virology or vaccines.
The only danger is delive3red by syringe.. don't accept the mythology of pandemic RNA molecules that's as real as Cat in the Hat pink snow sold with PCR fraud. Learn the bio0logy do not adopt the lies of an invisible enemy their swabs can find like shooting stars.
If they might add to the picture, two more sites - what can anyone say about the GCBR Index? There's nothing but the map and I'm not a metadata reader. But the submenu 'Lab leak risk burden' has the USA tagged as '100' for risk, head and shoulders above the rest of the world.
Where's a tangible benefit? And action items: conduct, engage, convene, educate. ?
"Together, we:
Conduct research and analysis on major domestic and international health security issues.
Engage with researchers, the policymaking community, and the private sector to make progress in the field.
Convene expert working groups, congressional seminars, scientific meetings, conferences, and tabletop exercises to stimulate new thinking and provoke action.
Educate a rising generation of scholars, practitioners, and policymakers."
This training tabletop exercise is based on a fictional scenario. The inputs experts used for modeling the potential impact were fictional. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials.
Clade X illustrated high-level strategic decisions and policies needed to prevent a severe pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail."
This training tabletop exercise is based on a fictional scenario. The inputs experts used for modeling the potential impact were fictional. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials.
Recent economic studies show that pandemics will be the cause of an average annual economic loss of 0.7% of global GDP—or $570 billion. The players’ responses to the scenario illuminated the need for cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society, to avoid the catastrophic consequences that could arise from a large-scale pandemic.
Similar to the Center’s 3 previous exercises—Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm—Event 201 aimed to educate senior leaders at the highest level of US and international governments and leaders in global industries.
January 24, 2020 – In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019."
The Capitol Hill Steering Committee on Health Security is an informal forum to explore new policies, programs, and technologies that can improve national health security now and in the future. It convenes staff from congressional offices, federal agencies, and the invited media and public to find ways to collaborate and strengthen our health security.
The Steering Committee is sponsored and managed by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. Currently, four bipartisan United States Senators serve as Honorary Senate Co-Chairs, five bipartisan United States House of Representatives serve as Honorary House Co-Chairs, and four former federal government public health leaders serve as Honorary Founding Members."
As stated above the forum is informal, participants are invited, the concern is economic, and requiring , "cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society" - is this what public hearings have devolved to? For all intents and purposes out of the public eye?
"The go-to definition when discussing sustainability is “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”."
"In general, sustainability is understood as a form of intergenerational ethics in which the environmental and economic actions taken by present persons do not diminish the opportunities of future persons to enjoy similar levels of wealth, utility, or welfare."
Thanks!! Rough parallels in global IMF, WHO, SDGs? Top heavy planning, coordinating; government/private player partnership; little transparency, less public information or participation. Huge dollar signs, ultimate subservience.
"Because the COVID-19 vaccine is not yet available (as of this writing), the United States has an opportunity to anticipate and study potential issues that are related to human factors and to develop evidence-informed policies and practices that facilitate the public’s understanding of, access to, and ultimate uptake of a novel coronavirus vaccine.
The Working Group’s reports include an agenda to guide the aggregation, generation, and translation of research about the social, behavioral, and communication challenges anticipated with COVID-19 vaccine as well as a set of actionable recommendations for public health and government authorities on how to enhance public trust and health with COVID-19 vaccination.
"Prof. Larson’s research focuses on the analysis of social and political factors that can affect uptake of health interventions and influence policies. Her particular interest is on risk and rumour management from clinical trials to delivery – and building public trust
Dr. Brooke Liu's qualitative and quantitative research investigates how government messages, media, and interpersonal communication can motivate people to successfully respond to and recover from hazards
Mr. Rex Long, MA, is a PhD student in anthropology at Texas State University. He also works as a Research Associate at Gibson Consulting, providing high quality consulting and research services to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of K-12 education at the school, school system, regional, and state levels.
[Dr. Saad Omer] has conducted several studies on interventions to increase immunization coverage and acceptance. "
"Building on the methodology presented in the pilot working paper (Sachs, Lafortune and Drumm, November 2023), we gauge countries’ commitment to UN-based multilateralism by focusing on six headline indicators:
1. Ratification of major UN treaties
2. Percentage of votes aligned with the international majority at the UN General Assembly (UNGA)
3. Participation in selected UN organizations and agencies
4. Participation in conflicts and militarization
5. The use of unilateral coercive measures (UCMs)
6. Contribute to the UN budget and international solidarity"
USA SCORE: 15.8
USA RANK: 193 of 193
Figure 3.1.2 | The 2024 Index of Countries' Support to UN-Based Multilateralism (UN-Mi)
The big lie is in the biology that ALL virology is built on models of synthetic clones made by CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys from PCR consensus sequences and grown in E.coli because RNA cannot replicate in the wild and petrie dish models used to create vaccines are ALL the same Gain of Function ie clones grown in bacteria. https://web.archive.org/web/20200803152807/https://www.promega.com/resources/guides/cell-biology/transfection/
The high purity clones stuffed into rodents are the models for viral infection but Mother Nature will NEVER change to adopted some petrie dish model. GoF is a lab tool used for decades and how EVERY mRNA TRANSFECTION was made. No GoF is no virology or vaccines.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
The "novel virus" was the excuse to roll out TRANSFECTION as an "investigational vaccine" and turn mop & bucket level lab tool into cash cow with IP reset. It was deadly by design because human bodies NEVER tolerate foreign proteins & it was known since 1999 Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger even if the protein was selected to repair a genetic flaw. https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
The only danger is delive3red by syringe.. don't accept the mythology of pandemic RNA molecules that's as real as Cat in the Hat pink snow sold with PCR fraud. Learn the bio0logy do not adopt the lies of an invisible enemy their swabs can find like shooting stars.
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N
Thanks. Don’t really have knowledge to assess this. Will keep in mind.
If they might add to the picture, two more sites - what can anyone say about the GCBR Index? There's nothing but the map and I'm not a metadata reader. But the submenu 'Lab leak risk burden' has the USA tagged as '100' for risk, head and shoulders above the rest of the world.
https://gcbrindex.org/
And this,
https://www.globalbiolabs.org/map
And very active Johns Hopkins, WEF, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
"Our Mission: To protect people’s health from epidemics and disasters and ensure that communities are resilient to major challenges."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/
Where's a tangible benefit? And action items: conduct, engage, convene, educate. ?
"Together, we:
Conduct research and analysis on major domestic and international health security issues.
Engage with researchers, the policymaking community, and the private sector to make progress in the field.
Convene expert working groups, congressional seminars, scientific meetings, conferences, and tabletop exercises to stimulate new thinking and provoke action.
Educate a rising generation of scholars, practitioners, and policymakers."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/our-work-at-the-center-for-health-security
Regarding tabletop exercises,
15 May 2018
"Tabletop Exercise. Clade X
This training tabletop exercise is based on a fictional scenario. The inputs experts used for modeling the potential impact were fictional. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials.
Clade X illustrated high-level strategic decisions and policies needed to prevent a severe pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/clade-x-tabletop-exercise
18 October 2019
"Tabletop Exercise. Event 201
This training tabletop exercise is based on a fictional scenario. The inputs experts used for modeling the potential impact were fictional. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials.
Recent economic studies show that pandemics will be the cause of an average annual economic loss of 0.7% of global GDP—or $570 billion. The players’ responses to the scenario illuminated the need for cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society, to avoid the catastrophic consequences that could arise from a large-scale pandemic.
Similar to the Center’s 3 previous exercises—Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm—Event 201 aimed to educate senior leaders at the highest level of US and international governments and leaders in global industries.
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise
24 January 2020
"Statement about nCoV and our pandemic exercise
Center News
January 24, 2020 – In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/2020/statement-about-ncov-and-our-pandemic-exercise
"Our Work
The Capitol Hill Steering Committee on Health Security is an informal forum to explore new policies, programs, and technologies that can improve national health security now and in the future. It convenes staff from congressional offices, federal agencies, and the invited media and public to find ways to collaborate and strengthen our health security.
The Steering Committee is sponsored and managed by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. Currently, four bipartisan United States Senators serve as Honorary Senate Co-Chairs, five bipartisan United States House of Representatives serve as Honorary House Co-Chairs, and four former federal government public health leaders serve as Honorary Founding Members."
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/the-capitol-hill-steering-committee.
As stated above the forum is informal, participants are invited, the concern is economic, and requiring , "cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society" - is this what public hearings have devolved to? For all intents and purposes out of the public eye?
Much more at the website,
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/
Thanks. Didn’t know about these resources. Will look.
Sorry but the real discussion to be had? What happened to Limits to Growth?
https://donellameadows.org/the-limits-to-growth-now-available-to-read-online/
https://donellameadows.org/archives/a-synopsis-limits-to-growth-the-30-year-update/
Donella Meadows systems theory?
https://donellameadows.org/systems-thinking-resources/
Circular economy, doughnut economics?
https://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/
Sustainability in a truer sense? (Or I could be wrong) Focus on health not disease?
Jan Oberg's peace through peaceful means? [Note: no mention of the 'w' word]
"grassroots
from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
noun plural People at a local or low level rather than at the center or upper levels of an organization or movement. Often used with the.
noun plural The lowest or most basic level of an organization or movement.
adjective Of, or relating to people or society at the local level; of the grass roots
adjective of or involving the common people as constituting a fundamental political and economic group
adjective fundamental"
https://www.wordnik.com/words/grassroots
Re SDGs, a tangent but I think related: USAID/MCC/DFC>DFC/HIPSO>SDGs
https://indicators.ifipartnership.org/partners/
https://indicators.ifipartnership.org/workstreams-overview/sustainable-development-goals-work-stream/
Can you translate these impact indicators? I find the language baffling.
https://indicators.ifipartnership.org/indicators/joint-impact-indicators-jii/
Where is USA in this High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development reporting?
https://hlpf.un.org/countries
https://sdgs.un.org/2025ECOSOCPartnershipForum
Lending, borrowing, buying, paying: how compatible with sustaining?
https://urbansdgfinance.org/
See USA #193 of 193 here,
https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/chapters/part-3-government-support-to-un-based-multilateralism#figure-3-1-2-the-2024-index-of-countries-support-to-un-based-multilateralism-un-mi
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/04/un-expert-urges-states-finance-inclusive-and-sustainable-development-not-war
https://unpartnerships.un.org/jeffrey-d-sachs
UN warns of $4 trillion shortfall threatening global development goals
https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/04/1162671
With less than one fifth of targets on track, world is failing to deliver on promise of the Sustainable Development Goals, warns new UN report
https://www.un.org/en/with-less-than-one-fifth-of-targets-on-track
"The go-to definition when discussing sustainability is “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”."
https://earth.org/what-is-sustainability/
"In general, sustainability is understood as a form of intergenerational ethics in which the environmental and economic actions taken by present persons do not diminish the opportunities of future persons to enjoy similar levels of wealth, utility, or welfare."
https://www.britannica.com/science/sustainability
How does indebtedness relate to sustainability? Who really benefits?
Thanks!! Rough parallels in global IMF, WHO, SDGs? Top heavy planning, coordinating; government/private player partnership; little transparency, less public information or participation. Huge dollar signs, ultimate subservience.
https://qa.publichealth.jhu.edu/sites/default/files/2025-01/CHSC-factsheet-v4-2025-01-21.pdf
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/220525-caphillsteeringcmtetranscript.pdf
See this April 25, 2025 Register by April 24 -EVENT CANCELLED
Megan Test-Capitol Hill Steering Committee
https://web.cvent.com/event/6E2329DE-7EC0-4BE3-A38B-C7AC05C9415E/summary
Excellent analysis. Many thanks.
Have you read this. Fauci is the villain here too. It is comprehensive and compelling. /www.amazon.com/Emerging-Viruses-Nature-Accident-Intentional/dp/B002BN6X0K
Thanks.
Sam Husseini, there's more. A sample,
"Because the COVID-19 vaccine is not yet available (as of this writing), the United States has an opportunity to anticipate and study potential issues that are related to human factors and to develop evidence-informed policies and practices that facilitate the public’s understanding of, access to, and ultimate uptake of a novel coronavirus vaccine.
The Working Group’s reports include an agenda to guide the aggregation, generation, and translation of research about the social, behavioral, and communication challenges anticipated with COVID-19 vaccine as well as a set of actionable recommendations for public health and government authorities on how to enhance public trust and health with COVID-19 vaccination.
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/research-projects/project-archive
"Prof. Larson’s research focuses on the analysis of social and political factors that can affect uptake of health interventions and influence policies. Her particular interest is on risk and rumour management from clinical trials to delivery – and building public trust
Dr. Brooke Liu's qualitative and quantitative research investigates how government messages, media, and interpersonal communication can motivate people to successfully respond to and recover from hazards
Mr. Rex Long, MA, is a PhD student in anthropology at Texas State University. He also works as a Research Associate at Gibson Consulting, providing high quality consulting and research services to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of K-12 education at the school, school system, regional, and state levels.
[Dr. Saad Omer] has conducted several studies on interventions to increase immunization coverage and acceptance. "
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2023-01/converge-wg-member-roster.pdf
One more resource that seems credible
https://taxjustice.net/
United States
Corporate Tax Haven Index ranking: 25th
Financial Secrecy Index ranking: 1st
Tax lost each year to tax havens: $177,270,091,563
Tax loss inflicted each year on other countries: $20,161,882,813
Concise and illustrative?
"Building on the methodology presented in the pilot working paper (Sachs, Lafortune and Drumm, November 2023), we gauge countries’ commitment to UN-based multilateralism by focusing on six headline indicators:
1. Ratification of major UN treaties
2. Percentage of votes aligned with the international majority at the UN General Assembly (UNGA)
3. Participation in selected UN organizations and agencies
4. Participation in conflicts and militarization
5. The use of unilateral coercive measures (UCMs)
6. Contribute to the UN budget and international solidarity"
USA SCORE: 15.8
USA RANK: 193 of 193
Figure 3.1.2 | The 2024 Index of Countries' Support to UN-Based Multilateralism (UN-Mi)
https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/chapters/part-3-government-support-to-un-based-multilateralism#figure-3-1-2-the-2024-index-of-countries-support-to-un-based-multilateralism-un-mi