Contrary to the claims of Sen. Hawley and other sponsors, the legislation only instructs the DNI to release information relating to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. No examination of others.
Mr. Husseini, thanks for taking the time to think through the different strands of covid origins. It's deeply concerning to see disinformation (re)occurring right in front of our eyes. I have noticed some (twitter) people who sense the propagandistic threat to China in this new iteration of msm discussion of covid origins ("probably lab leak") have denounced lab origin, emphasizing the wet market theory again instead. I mean, there are so many ways for this story to get dissipated and for the truth to be evaded. I have noticed others on twitter saying, hey, why is this suddenly okay to talk about now? So there is some suspicion. But it's alarming how everywhere you look now, you hear the words "lab leak." I appreciate your pointing out Ruskin's comments and the fact that even declassified info is being held back, and that Hawley's "fix" neglects non-Wuhan-related information and more. Thanks again. Peace.
Keeping in mind for myself, we do not know the truth of covid origins or anywhere close to it. Pieces have not been connected that need connecting. I didn't know that this new FBI assertion was resting mainly on the fact that people working in the WIV lab had gotten sick; that's interesting. I would think stronger evidence for pursuing lab origin would lie in scrutinizing the virus itself? There seems to be a lack of clarity on whether scientists can read genetic meddling in a virus' dna. I would think it is discoverable, but I am not in that line of work.
The evidence of people not from Wuhan who were infected in the "autumn of 2019" is voluminous. Antibody tests and dates of "onset of symptom" provide this evidence. Would this Congress search compel researchers looking into the origins question to finally interview some of these 130 Americans?
Will any senator or representative ever talk about these early cases?
Mr. Husseini, thanks for taking the time to think through the different strands of covid origins. It's deeply concerning to see disinformation (re)occurring right in front of our eyes. I have noticed some (twitter) people who sense the propagandistic threat to China in this new iteration of msm discussion of covid origins ("probably lab leak") have denounced lab origin, emphasizing the wet market theory again instead. I mean, there are so many ways for this story to get dissipated and for the truth to be evaded. I have noticed others on twitter saying, hey, why is this suddenly okay to talk about now? So there is some suspicion. But it's alarming how everywhere you look now, you hear the words "lab leak." I appreciate your pointing out Ruskin's comments and the fact that even declassified info is being held back, and that Hawley's "fix" neglects non-Wuhan-related information and more. Thanks again. Peace.
Keeping in mind for myself, we do not know the truth of covid origins or anywhere close to it. Pieces have not been connected that need connecting. I didn't know that this new FBI assertion was resting mainly on the fact that people working in the WIV lab had gotten sick; that's interesting. I would think stronger evidence for pursuing lab origin would lie in scrutinizing the virus itself? There seems to be a lack of clarity on whether scientists can read genetic meddling in a virus' dna. I would think it is discoverable, but I am not in that line of work.
The evidence of people not from Wuhan who were infected in the "autumn of 2019" is voluminous. Antibody tests and dates of "onset of symptom" provide this evidence. Would this Congress search compel researchers looking into the origins question to finally interview some of these 130 Americans?
Will any senator or representative ever talk about these early cases?
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/early-spread-evidence-in-one-document