6 Comments

Lies and obfuscations are part and parcel of Matthew Miller's responses on behalf of the State Department. They share that in common with the CIA (per Pompeo) which is one of the reasons they're such good buddies. It's refreshing to hear some of your colleagues still push back at Miller's hypocrisy. Thanks Sam.

Expand full comment

I don't understand how our so-called leaders sleep at night.

Expand full comment

While I shared your sentiment not that long ago, I have detached from trying to understand. I have no capacity to understand this deception so all my intellectual power and reason will not provide enlightenment.

These evil times days have been, for me, a spiritual revival of sorts. I watch in awe of the depth of the deception in every single human category of Life (my mind can't help but to think of hubris of tinkering with DNA in the bioweapons and trying to turn little girls into boys and vice versa, the GMO plants, lab-made 'food', nuclear and biological waste released onto earth, a full attack on Creation itself).

I rest comfortably in knowing Justice will occur, both here on Earth (Be not deceived, God will not be mocked. Whatever a person reaps, that will s/he sow. Galatians 6:7, otherwise known to anti-Jesus folks as "Karma") and in the eternal future.

For the remainder of us, let us support our brother Sam who exposes the evil and, I personally, look forward to That Day when Sam receives his reward of "Well done, my faithful servant". Sam, I pray for you and your family regularly. You are so very special in the Kingdom.

Expand full comment

Smirkula continues his evil charades. And Sam continues to question and confront him with facts. The truth will triumph through all of this.

Expand full comment

Like the Reagan State Department’s lies and obfuscation in response to divestment from apartheid which overturned Carter and succeeded in breathing life into the most abhorrent system universally condemned in the 20th century.

Expand full comment

Hi Sam, I would like you to establish the following points during a press conference:

1. The US alone is denying the Palestinian people access to to protection under international humanitarian law in the Security Council.

2. Denying protection under international humanitarian law = denying human rights = denying the human status of the Palestinian people.

3. Since the rule of law is negated by this administration, this administration has no moral authority to condemn Hamas for applying "eye for an eye tooth for a tooth" since only people who have access to rule under modern humanitarian law but choose to do otherwise can be considered criminals.

Because of this moral fact the righteous slave abolitionists acknowledge the atrocities of the slave uprisings but condemn the defenders of the slave system for these atrocities, not the slaves. Therefore the abolitionists would have condemned this administration for the innocent victims on both the Israeli side and the Palestinian side, to a lesser extent the Israelis and not at all the armed struggle of the Palestinian people.

4. This administration pretends that Israel is fighting terrorism by terrorizing and radicalizing people.

5. This administration is negating the Palestinian people protection not because of American imperial interest but because of self-interest, you are either bought and paid by the Israel lobby and the Christian Zionists and or blackmailed by Mossad/Epstein. This administration is destroying the soft-power of the US empire by being attached to the liability of Israel.

It could be done by stating the following to the one of these spokes persons:

-I would like to ask you 5 questions to put your answers on the record for posterity, the world knows that your answers will be "No" on every one of these question but I would like to offer you the opportunity to put your own personal spin on it so that it is abundantly clear that you own your answers, that they are a reflection of you character, so that that posterity can condemn you without ambiguity for your answers.

1. It is a fact that prominent Israeli people have been calling for genocide of the Palestinian people for at least for a decade in Israel, that it is an accepted and non-controversial topic i Israeli public discourse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GbKsAvuBDM

https://www.jewworldorder.org/kill-palestinians-to-get-closer-to-god-israeli-rabbi-says/

https://web.archive.org/web/20240602154713/https://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/yochanan-genocide-permissible/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsT6qCPDJIE

http://mondoweiss.net/2018/04/influential-soldiers-genocide/

The calls for genocide that has been so ample documented by South Africa in ICJ did not start after October the 7th , but has been part of the Israeli public discourse at least for a decade, these are just indisputable facts and you do not get to invert reality by denying these facts.

Talks about Genocide in accepted public discourse has resulted in criminal policies of the Israeli government on the Palestinian people, but your response here is No, correct?

Such as

https://www.thenation.com/article/anyone-you-see-you-shoot-israeli-soldiers-recall-2014-gaza-war/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/nov/16/israel2

https://electronicintifada.net/content/girl-shot-unrwa-school-dies/1912

https://archive.is/ufbj2

2. We do not think you are that brazen that you would deny that you are the only entity in the UNSC who is blocking the world's motions to hold Israel accountable for its crimes against the Palestinian people, but denying the Palestinian people protection under international humanitarian law by ensuring impunity for Israel, never punishing Israel for its crimes against the Palestinian people you are negating the human status of the Palestinian people, but your response is "No", correct?

3. If you would admit that you denying the Palestinian people protection under modern international humanitarian law and therefore the human status of the Palestinians, you would not be able accuse Hamas of terrorism for applying the default fallback law of "eye for an eye tooth for a tooth" , but your response here is "No", correct?

4. Israel is radicalizing the Palestinian people by killing 35000 people with 10 000 missing under the rubble in just 6 months "fighting Hamas", but your response here is "No", correct?

5. The slave abolitionists did not err when condemning the slave masters for the atrocities of the slaves during the slave uprisings because one cannot condemn people who are denied justice, but your answer here is "No", correct?

6. You are unable to apply leverage on Israel, they are commanding you to provide them with bombs and you obey, but not because of American imperial interests but because you are beholden to Jewish Zionist donors who have hi-jeaked the political system, but your anser here is "No", correct?

Expand full comment