VIDEO: State Dept. Won't Give Specifics on How Assange Hurt "National Security". Or How "Russiagate" -- Used to Demonize WikiLeaks -- May Have Actually Been Israelgate.
VIDEO: State Dept. Won't Give Specifics on How Assange Hurt "National Security". Or How "Russiagate" -- Used to Demonize WikiLeaks -- May Have Actually Been Israelgate.
Questioning for World Press Freedom Day .... A new report by cybersecurity expert James Bamford charges it was Israel -- not Russia --that colluded with Trump campaign. State gives no response as yet.
You go, brother! Congrats on navigating the fine line in D.C. between persistence/insistence and getting banned*. And for bringing up Bamford's article. Shame on the Washington so-called press corps for not following up. But then they'd all have to admit how much a part of the problem they all were, whether duped/doopid or witting -- during Russiagate.
* (made me think about how women -- still -- have to navigate a similar fine line in many circumstances)
You appear to have better information that what Bamford writes in his article. Or at least I did not see "Unit 8200, the Israeli equivalent of the NSA." Your angle-- that Israel could (and perhaps --likely-- did) use this illegal contact to blackmail Trump-- what a great and perhaps blockbuster story with huge implications for the future campaign. Glad to hear you continue to research this.
Also, glad to subscribe, and while I am at it, I like this song . Best wishes.
Re Assange damaging National Security: as I remember it the documents were being gone through and sensitive parts were being redacted. Was it the Guardian, DoD and JA? Then for some reason I thought the military itself threw their hands up and said enough. Thereby letting JA release unredacted documents.
A friend who worked in Iraqi embassy said ppl lost lives because of it. He blames JA but it seems like DoD were at fault. What do you think?
You go, brother! Congrats on navigating the fine line in D.C. between persistence/insistence and getting banned*. And for bringing up Bamford's article. Shame on the Washington so-called press corps for not following up. But then they'd all have to admit how much a part of the problem they all were, whether duped/doopid or witting -- during Russiagate.
* (made me think about how women -- still -- have to navigate a similar fine line in many circumstances)
You appear to have better information that what Bamford writes in his article. Or at least I did not see "Unit 8200, the Israeli equivalent of the NSA." Your angle-- that Israel could (and perhaps --likely-- did) use this illegal contact to blackmail Trump-- what a great and perhaps blockbuster story with huge implications for the future campaign. Glad to hear you continue to research this.
Also, glad to subscribe, and while I am at it, I like this song . Best wishes.
https://youtu.be/oJn4vAjJ_w8
Re Assange damaging National Security: as I remember it the documents were being gone through and sensitive parts were being redacted. Was it the Guardian, DoD and JA? Then for some reason I thought the military itself threw their hands up and said enough. Thereby letting JA release unredacted documents.
A friend who worked in Iraqi embassy said ppl lost lives because of it. He blames JA but it seems like DoD were at fault. What do you think?