7 Comments
User's avatar
Michael's avatar

Solidarity with your tremendous efforts, Sam! How else can we help?

Sam Husseini's avatar

Spread this info. Thank you.

M Miller's avatar

Thank you Sam. Rhetoric dressed as intention is a legal pretense. The only thing the hegemon understand is power and at present, despite MSM to the contrary, Iran has the hammer. As Clausewitz, the famous early 19th century military tactician once said "war is the continuation of politics by other means". We'll see what regional changes ensue.

Alice's avatar

Uniting for peace is a process in a corrupted system. Players are compromised. If Israel and USA/west governments were out of the OPT, how could Israel/USA/UK/et al. attack Iran? I mean without being more blatant with less excuse than they now are? (and costing more fuel and longer travel time advance warning?)

We've always been able - and should know enough already - to UNITE FOR PEACE INDIVIDUALLY. Were we each to do it, we'd all be doing it. TOGETHER. As the ICJ reiterated on 19 July 2024,

" the State of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful;

 the State of Israel is under an obligation to bring to an end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible;

 the State of Israel is under an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement activities, and

to evacuate all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

 the State of Israel has the obligation to make reparation for the damage caused to all the natural or legal persons concerned in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

 all States are under an obligation not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by the continued presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory . . . "

https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-pre-01-00-en.pdf

And for those forgetful of Paragraph 1 of the UN Charter preamble,

"WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED

to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom . . . "

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text

Not hardly peace through bullying, murder and destruction, bribery, overpowering, or undermining. We are each responsible. Maybe we're too busy holding our congressmen and local/statewide media accountable by quoting them facts and law to be reading this - or that's not a positive first step?

Nancy Mahoney's avatar

May they Unite for Peace! So many lives at stake, so much culture and beauty!

AtchaJohn's avatar

Hi Mr Husseini

I'm reading you. And FYI I have no truck with either the PI or The Hague Group. I heard you and I am in response too with the following:

The current war is on the US - Israeli side seemingly AI driven. Further, it's the largest AI driven war if so. And it is proposed this recent murder/killing/strike on the young ones in Iran is too a result of AI. The caveat if so and mentioned to consider is the strike was as a result of a possible AI hallucination. The target was apparently a near by faculty and the girls are an error.

Now, whatever, but as bad as this is if correct. It's opening a horror to us in consideration. That seems to be that this war, its run-up and all negotiation or behaviour of US - Israel could be AI - Human interactive reasoning. That is, it's almost really a long term cybernetic based conflict.

This is my point: IMO you and a few may absorb this (now) and comprehend that this then may be has already gone beyond. It's over the pale. It's gone past anything but cultural, our societal, the population's revolution and basically an utter oust of the powers creating things as they're suggested here to have be.

The behaviour of the US individuals in negotiations or government or military and what we will observe may be, and I proffer already is out of reason and logic for here-and-now to be understood as normal for these situations. At least to us the folks watching and frankly at a loss to understand.

I can offer more but it's yes, speculative to say more now. Nevertheless, please consider because if nukes are used/employed I offer it will be therefore reasonable for us to expect let's say, cybernetic reasoning and basically more training for the AI system. The option is not Samson but training. Training by their conjoined AI - Human experimental reasoning to possibly achieve a desired outcome. Militarily.

I'm saying there's no limits now.

If this is unreasonable to you I'm sorry yet it's likely. Time will tell. And i urge consideration.

Thanks and you are amongst the crew to take notice of

Peace

(I'm not happy to post this yet I'm absolutely off the planet in worry)

AtchaJohn's avatar

Hello

I have returned to update the post made (above)

Here's a section of text from a report on telegram I find today:

■ Authorities reported hundreds of martyrs, including children, and extensive disruption to emergency services.

■ Iranian MFA spokesman Esmail Baghaei condemned the attacks, saying the aggressors “continue to indiscriminately strike residential areas, sparing neither hospitals, schools, Red Crescent facilities, nor cultural monuments

------

My thoughts now, here: I'm knocked out. I am aware AI is as was said by me previously. And the notion of an AI hallucination is absolutely true to be there considered.

Nevertheless it's looking like, if even the slaughter of the young girls was indeed an AI error. It's looking like the Israeli and US are liberally and purposely hitting soft targets. I'm appalled. All day i have been picking up on this trend of targeting on Iran.

I just clarify...

It's consistent attrocity... I'm appalled. To hit these targets as purposely is is now obvious confounds the notion of error I read of and considered in my previous post.

There you go.

Whilst the flow of the previous post is tenable and likely. I'm erring to the acknowledgement of this horror overall as incomprehensible to me. Yet it's AI aided yes in the main, and so it's that the responsibility is not to be hidden behind the argument I suggested.

I am wiser in the view now today.

Thanks